I just read a piece here about Scribd’s attempt at a Kindle-Unlimited-style subscription service for books and how Scribd’s lack of data, and possibly math and just plain attention, led to the service’s semi-downfall. The article is interesting and fun – while I’m rather prone to philosophy, the nuts and bolts of the book business always intrigues* me. However, it intrigues me in part because it’s not something I know much about, so I can’t really contribute to that discussion.
Instead, I want to talk about a line that stuck out to me, partly because it was funny and partly because it surprised me (and partly because I had to go look up some of the stuff in it): “Romance readers are the Great White Sharks of the reading world. They are the 80 in the 80/20 rule. They are the power in a power law.”
Okay, let’s be honest, comparing bookworms to great white sharks is just funny. Thank you for that, Carolyn Jewel. Also, it might just be that before I hit up Wikipedia I had no idea what the 80/20 rule and power law were, but something in that second part of the line (and possibly a primer from the great white shark comment) give me this sense of some immense, powerful force lurking out there, unbeknownst to most. Maybe it’s less romantic if you know more about economics and what have you, but to me it’s a pretty cool image. And even without the mystery of lurking in the darkness, you still get the sense of raw force, which is powerful.
And I’m going to stop geeking out over the craftsmanship of it and move on. (Look, I’m an English nerd, you have to expect that kind of thing.**)
The author of the piece (Carolyn Jewel) says that the typical romance reader will go through four to five books a week, hence the shark comparison. From what she says, Scribd wound up cutting nearly all the romance books from their service because people were reading them too much and costing Scribd too much money. That surprised me. I mean, there’s no particular reason I think romance readers wouldn’t read that much, I just didn’t know they did. It made me curious – why is that? I don’t really know any big romance readers (that I’m aware of), so I don’t know anyone I could ask.
Anyway, the voracity of romance readers apparently surprised Scribd, too. Jewel suggests that it’s because they just weren’t paying attention – that since romance readers are primarily women, Scribd effectively dismissed the genre as being “for girls” rather than “real books” and didn’t put much more thought into it. She never suggests they did it deliberately, which makes sense; many instances of prejudice aren’t deliberate. People just don’t think about some group of people, and then something gets messed up. (See: face-tracking software can’t see black people.) It’s too bad Scribd handled it by wiping out their romance selection, though. It may have been the only way to save their budget, and if so it’s understandable, but that’s a lot of disappointed readers.
But going back to Jewel’s theory on why it became a problem to begin with: I was happy to see someone else propose that some books are looked down on because of their readers. It’s not as if I thought no one else had ever come up with the idea, but I hadn’t ever heard someone else say it. On the other hand, I’ve already said I have my own prejudices when it comes to romance, and I have the nagging feeling that my surprise at how many books romance readers go through is the product of that. Problematic. Well, another day, another lesson. I learned some interesting things, enjoyed a well-written line, and broadened my horizons a little. Not bad for a few minutes’ reading.
* Intrigue? “Nuts and bolts” is technically a compound subject and should thus take a plural verb, but on the other hand it’s also an idiom and thus weird. Hm. I mean, the obvious solution would be to just use a different expression, but where’s the fun in that?
** On a related note, the book How to Write a Sentence: And How to Read One by Stanley Fish is fantastic, and if you are also an English nerd, you should absolutely read it. Hm, maybe I should re-read it…